Fishers Hill vs Fitzgeralds Mount — Which is Safer?

Compare climate risk between Fishers Hill, New South Wales and Fitzgeralds Mount, New South Wales. Our analysis uses data from BOM, CSIRO, and state hazard authorities to score each suburb across 6 climate hazards.

49/100
Moderate
43/100
Moderate
Hazard
Flood34/10048/100
Bushfire64/10063/100
Heat78/10074/100
Storm49/10041/100
Coastal50/10018/100
Cyclone21/10012/100

How to Interpret These Scores

Each hazard is scored from 0 (minimal risk) to 100 (severe risk). Scores are derived from BOM historical data, CSIRO climate projections, and state hazard authority mapping. A score of 50 means the property is in the moderate range — above average risk but not extreme. Scores above 67 indicate high risk requiring due diligence.

Minimal
0-16
Low
17-33
Moderate
34-50
Elevated
51-66
High
67-83
Severe
84-100

Insurance Cost Trajectory

Based on the hazard scores for these suburbs, current annual insurance premiums are estimated around A$6,504. With projected climate changes under RCP 8.5, premiums could rise to approximately A$9,106 by 2030 and A$16,910 by 2050. These projections align with Insurance Council of Australia data showing 28% average premium increases nationally between 2022-2025, with higher-risk areas seeing 80-120% increases.

Current
A$6,504
2030 (RCP 4.5)
A$9,106
2050 (RCP 8.5)
A$16,910

Property Value Climate Impact

Rising insurance premiums directly impact property values. Research from the Insurance Council of Australia and climate risk analysts shows that properties in areas with higher climate risk can experience a climate value drag. For a median-priced home, this could mean a potential impact of around A$52,030 or more over time.

Verdict

Fitzgeralds Mount has a lower overall climate risk score (43/100) compared to Fishers Hill (49/100). We recommend getting an address-level report for properties in both suburbs before making a purchase decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fishers Hill or Fitzgeralds Mount safer from flooding?
Fishers Hill has a flood risk score of 34/100, while Fitzgeralds Mount scores 48/100. A lower score indicates lower flood risk. Get an address-level flood risk report for a specific property.
Which suburb has lower bushfire risk?
Fishers Hill scores 64/100 for bushfire risk. Fitzgeralds Mount scores 63/100. Fire risk depends on proximity to vegetation and local fire history.
Should I buy in Fishers Hill or Fitzgeralds Mount?
Both suburbs have climate considerations. Fitzgeralds Mount has a lower overall climate risk score. We recommend getting a full ClimateNest report for any specific property you're considering, which includes 8 hazard scores, insurance projections, and actionable recommendations.

Check Your Flood Risk Now

Check Fishers Hill's specific flood risk and see how it compares to nearby suburbs. Enter your address for an instant risk assessment.

Free instant previewCSIRO-powered data

What A$69 could save you from

$7.2B
2022 insured disaster losses*
$300B+
climate risk to property by 2050*
30-120%
insurance premium increases in high-risk areas*

*Industry sources: ICA, APRA, RBA

Full report from A$69 · Australian addresses only · 8 hazard scores · Insurance trajectory · 2030 & 2050 projections