Hawkesbury Heights vs Hawks Nest — Which is Safer?

Compare climate risk between Hawkesbury Heights, New South Wales and Hawks Nest, New South Wales. Our analysis uses data from BOM, CSIRO, and state hazard authorities to score each suburb across 6 climate hazards.

35/100
Moderate
49/100
Moderate
Hazard
Flood31/10059/100
Bushfire23/10064/100
Heat59/10078/100
Storm26/10032/100
Coastal56/10032/100
Cyclone15/10026/100

How to Interpret These Scores

Each hazard is scored from 0 (minimal risk) to 100 (severe risk). Scores are derived from BOM historical data, CSIRO climate projections, and state hazard authority mapping. A score of 50 means the property is in the moderate range — above average risk but not extreme. Scores above 67 indicate high risk requiring due diligence.

Minimal
0-16
Low
17-33
Moderate
34-50
Elevated
51-66
High
67-83
Severe
84-100

Insurance Cost Trajectory

Based on the hazard scores for these suburbs, current annual insurance premiums are estimated around A$6,504. With projected climate changes under RCP 8.5, premiums could rise to approximately A$9,106 by 2030 and A$16,910 by 2050. These projections align with Insurance Council of Australia data showing 28% average premium increases nationally between 2022-2025, with higher-risk areas seeing 80-120% increases.

Current
A$6,504
2030 (RCP 4.5)
A$9,106
2050 (RCP 8.5)
A$16,910

Property Value Climate Impact

Rising insurance premiums directly impact property values. Research from the Insurance Council of Australia and climate risk analysts shows that properties in areas with higher climate risk can experience a climate value drag. For a median-priced home, this could mean a potential impact of around A$52,030 or more over time.

Verdict

Hawkesbury Heights has a lower overall climate risk score (35/100) compared to Hawks Nest (49/100). We recommend getting an address-level report for properties in both suburbs before making a purchase decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hawkesbury Heights or Hawks Nest safer from flooding?
Hawkesbury Heights has a flood risk score of 31/100, while Hawks Nest scores 59/100. A lower score indicates lower flood risk. Get an address-level flood risk report for a specific property.
Which suburb has lower bushfire risk?
Hawkesbury Heights scores 23/100 for bushfire risk. Hawks Nest scores 64/100. Fire risk depends on proximity to vegetation and local fire history.
Should I buy in Hawkesbury Heights or Hawks Nest?
Both suburbs have climate considerations. Hawkesbury Heights has a lower overall climate risk score. We recommend getting a full ClimateNest report for any specific property you're considering, which includes 8 hazard scores, insurance projections, and actionable recommendations.

Check Your Flood Risk Now

Check Hawkesbury Heights's specific flood risk and see how it compares to nearby suburbs. Enter your address for an instant risk assessment.

Free instant previewCSIRO-powered data

What A$69 could save you from

$7.2B
2022 insured disaster losses*
$300B+
climate risk to property by 2050*
30-120%
insurance premium increases in high-risk areas*

*Industry sources: ICA, APRA, RBA

Full report from A$69 · Australian addresses only · 8 hazard scores · Insurance trajectory · 2030 & 2050 projections

Hawkesbury Heights vs Hawks Nest — Climate Risk Comparison | ClimateNest | ClimateNest