ClimateNest
ClimateNest

Rose Valley vs Rosebank — Which is Safer?

Compare climate risk between Rose Valley, New South Wales and Rosebank, New South Wales. Our analysis uses data from BOM, CSIRO, and state hazard authorities to score each suburb across 6 climate hazards.

39/100
Moderate
32/100
Low
Hazard
Flood24/10031/100
Bushfire45/10017/100
Heat54/10034/100
Storm49/10024/100
Coastal41/10059/100
Cyclone22/10027/100

How to Interpret These Scores

Each hazard is scored from 0 (minimal risk) to 100 (severe risk). Scores are derived from BOM historical data, CSIRO climate projections, and state hazard authority mapping. A score of 50 means the property is in the moderate range — above average risk but not extreme. Scores above 67 indicate high risk requiring due diligence.

Minimal
0-16
Low
17-33
Moderate
34-50
Elevated
51-66
High
67-83
Severe
84-100

Insurance Cost Trajectory

Based on the hazard scores for these suburbs, current annual insurance premiums are estimated around A$5,212. With projected climate changes under RCP 8.5, premiums could rise to approximately A$7,297 by 2030 and A$13,551 by 2050. These projections align with Insurance Council of Australia data showing 28% average premium increases nationally between 2022-2025, with higher-risk areas seeing 80-120% increases.

Current
A$5,212
2030 (RCP 4.5)
A$7,297
2050 (RCP 8.5)
A$13,551

Property Value Climate Impact

Rising insurance premiums directly impact property values. Research from the Insurance Council of Australia and climate risk analysts shows that properties in areas with higher climate risk can experience a climate value drag. For a median-priced home, this could mean a potential impact of around A$41,695 or more over time.

Verdict

Rosebank has a lower overall climate risk score (32/100) compared to Rose Valley (39/100). We recommend getting an address-level report for properties in both suburbs before making a purchase decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rose Valley or Rosebank safer from flooding?
Rose Valley has a flood risk score of 24/100, while Rosebank scores 31/100. A lower score indicates lower flood risk. Get an address-level flood risk report for a specific property.
Which suburb has lower bushfire risk?
Rose Valley scores 45/100 for bushfire risk. Rosebank scores 17/100. Fire risk depends on proximity to vegetation and local fire history.
Should I buy in Rose Valley or Rosebank?
Both suburbs have climate considerations. Rosebank has a lower overall climate risk score. We recommend getting a full ClimateNest report for any specific property you're considering, which includes 8 hazard scores, insurance projections, and actionable recommendations.

Explore Detailed Reports

Rose Valley Flood RiskRosebank Flood RiskRose Valley Should I Buy?Rosebank Should I Buy?

Check Your Flood Risk Now

Check Rose Valley's specific flood risk and see how it compares to nearby suburbs. Enter your address for an instant risk assessment.

Free instant previewCSIRO-powered data
Get Your Flood Risk Report — A$69

What A$69 could save you from

$7.2B
2022 insured disaster losses*
$300B+
climate risk to property by 2050*
30-120%
insurance premium increases in high-risk areas*

*Industry sources: ICA, APRA, RBA

Full report from A$69 · Australian addresses only · 8 hazard scores · Insurance trajectory · 2030 & 2050 projections