Scotts Brook vs Seabird — Which is Safer?

Compare climate risk between Scotts Brook, Western Australia and Seabird, Western Australia. Our analysis uses data from BOM, CSIRO, and state hazard authorities to score each suburb across 6 climate hazards.

30/100
Low
35/100
Moderate
Hazard
Flood24/10023/100
Bushfire17/10052/100
Heat71/10060/100
Storm35/10031/100
Coastal12/10023/100
Cyclone22/10020/100

How to Interpret These Scores

Each hazard is scored from 0 (minimal risk) to 100 (severe risk). Scores are derived from BOM historical data, CSIRO climate projections, and state hazard authority mapping. A score of 50 means the property is in the moderate range — above average risk but not extreme. Scores above 67 indicate high risk requiring due diligence.

Minimal
0-16
Low
17-33
Moderate
34-50
Elevated
51-66
High
67-83
Severe
84-100

Insurance Cost Trajectory

Based on the hazard scores for these suburbs, current annual insurance premiums are estimated around A$6,028. With projected climate changes under RCP 8.5, premiums could rise to approximately A$8,439 by 2030 and A$15,673 by 2050. These projections align with Insurance Council of Australia data showing 28% average premium increases nationally between 2022-2025, with higher-risk areas seeing 80-120% increases.

Current
A$6,028
2030 (RCP 4.5)
A$8,439
2050 (RCP 8.5)
A$15,673

Property Value Climate Impact

Rising insurance premiums directly impact property values. Research from the Insurance Council of Australia and climate risk analysts shows that properties in areas with higher climate risk can experience a climate value drag. For a median-priced home, this could mean a potential impact of around A$48,225 or more over time.

Verdict

Scotts Brook has a lower overall climate risk score (30/100) compared to Seabird (35/100). We recommend getting an address-level report for properties in both suburbs before making a purchase decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Scotts Brook or Seabird safer from flooding?
Scotts Brook has a flood risk score of 24/100, while Seabird scores 23/100. A lower score indicates lower flood risk. Get an address-level flood risk report for a specific property.
Which suburb has lower bushfire risk?
Scotts Brook scores 17/100 for bushfire risk. Seabird scores 52/100. Fire risk depends on proximity to vegetation and local fire history.
Should I buy in Scotts Brook or Seabird?
Both suburbs have climate considerations. Scotts Brook has a lower overall climate risk score. We recommend getting a full ClimateNest report for any specific property you're considering, which includes 8 hazard scores, insurance projections, and actionable recommendations.

Check Your Flood Risk Now

Check Scotts Brook's specific flood risk and see how it compares to nearby suburbs. Enter your address for an instant risk assessment.

Free instant previewCSIRO-powered data

What A$69 could save you from

$7.2B
2022 insured disaster losses*
$300B+
climate risk to property by 2050*
30-120%
insurance premium increases in high-risk areas*

*Industry sources: ICA, APRA, RBA

Full report from A$69 · Australian addresses only · 8 hazard scores · Insurance trajectory · 2030 & 2050 projections