Scrubby Mountain vs Seaforth — Which is Safer?

Compare climate risk between Scrubby Mountain, Queensland and Seaforth, Queensland. Our analysis uses data from BOM, CSIRO, and state hazard authorities to score each suburb across 6 climate hazards.

36/100
Moderate
30/100
Low
Hazard
Flood30/10048/100
Bushfire35/10033/100
Heat45/10036/100
Storm30/10028/100
Coastal50/10026/100
Cyclone23/1007/100

How to Interpret These Scores

Each hazard is scored from 0 (minimal risk) to 100 (severe risk). Scores are derived from BOM historical data, CSIRO climate projections, and state hazard authority mapping. A score of 50 means the property is in the moderate range — above average risk but not extreme. Scores above 67 indicate high risk requiring due diligence.

Minimal
0-16
Low
17-33
Moderate
34-50
Elevated
51-66
High
67-83
Severe
84-100

Insurance Cost Trajectory

Based on the hazard scores for these suburbs, current annual insurance premiums are estimated around A$4,600. With projected climate changes under RCP 8.5, premiums could rise to approximately A$6,440 by 2030 and A$11,960 by 2050. These projections align with Insurance Council of Australia data showing 28% average premium increases nationally between 2022-2025, with higher-risk areas seeing 80-120% increases.

Current
A$4,600
2030 (RCP 4.5)
A$6,440
2050 (RCP 8.5)
A$11,960

Property Value Climate Impact

Rising insurance premiums directly impact property values. Research from the Insurance Council of Australia and climate risk analysts shows that properties in areas with higher climate risk can experience a climate value drag. For a median-priced home, this could mean a potential impact of around A$36,800 or more over time.

Verdict

Seaforth has a lower overall climate risk score (30/100) compared to Scrubby Mountain (36/100). We recommend getting an address-level report for properties in both suburbs before making a purchase decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Scrubby Mountain or Seaforth safer from flooding?
Scrubby Mountain has a flood risk score of 30/100, while Seaforth scores 48/100. A lower score indicates lower flood risk. Get an address-level flood risk report for a specific property.
Which suburb has lower bushfire risk?
Scrubby Mountain scores 35/100 for bushfire risk. Seaforth scores 33/100. Fire risk depends on proximity to vegetation and local fire history.
Should I buy in Scrubby Mountain or Seaforth?
Both suburbs have climate considerations. Seaforth has a lower overall climate risk score. We recommend getting a full ClimateNest report for any specific property you're considering, which includes 8 hazard scores, insurance projections, and actionable recommendations.

Check Your Flood Risk Now

Check Scrubby Mountain's specific flood risk and see how it compares to nearby suburbs. Enter your address for an instant risk assessment.

Free instant previewCSIRO-powered data

What A$69 could save you from

$7.2B
2022 insured disaster losses*
$300B+
climate risk to property by 2050*
30-120%
insurance premium increases in high-risk areas*

*Industry sources: ICA, APRA, RBA

Full report from A$69 · Australian addresses only · 8 hazard scores · Insurance trajectory · 2030 & 2050 projections